Diff. between Local Stateless Session Beans & Normal Java Bea ns 2004-08-18 - By Guy Katz
Back
assuming your session facade is a session EJB.
your new architecture, in general, is more common for most cases.
of course, it all dependes on your system but generally, you will not use a
Session facade EJB to call another session EJB as this is some what of a
duplication.
you would call an Entity EJB from a session EJB but this is not your case
from what i see (as you have a DAO).
-- --Original Message-- --
From: A mailing list for Java(tm) 2 Platform, Enterprise Edition
[mailto:J2EE-INTEREST@(protected)]On Behalf Of Manish Malhotra
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2004 12:01 PM
To: J2EE-INTEREST@(protected)
Subject: Diff. between Local Stateless Session Beans & Normal Java Beans
Hi All,
We are following a architecture :
BD->> Session Facade -->> Manager (Normal Java class) -->> DAO.
Previously these Managers (Normal Java class) were Stateless Session Beans
(Local) and we were calling these thr. FAcade.
So, Please can any body explain me is there any flaw in the new
architecture.
Its urgent!
Many Thanks.
regards,
Manish
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to listserv@(protected) and include in the body
of the message "signoff J2EE-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
listserv@(protected) and include in the body of the message "help".
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to listserv@(protected) and include in the body
of the message "signoff J2EE-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
listserv@(protected) and include in the body of the message "help".
|
|
