Hello,

I read once that tomcat 5 is designed to handle the static files.
Is mod_jk still necessary then ?
do you have any experience on that ?

Regards,
ERic
----- Original Message -----
From: "Giuliano Gavazzi" <dev+lists@(protected)>
To: "Tomcat Users List" <tomcat-user@(protected)>
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2003 6:34 PM
Subject: Re: Apache Tomcat mod_jk 1.2.5 WSC configuration for Tomcat 5


> At 17:04 +0200 2003/10/12, Thorsten Westmeier wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >if I interpret the Version-Number correctly, then it is a follower
> >of the old JK Connector and not of the new JK2.
>
> I can confirm that.
>
> >Can I use my old uriworkermap.properties and workers.properties?
>
> I have just managed to build jk1.2.5 and jk2 on MacOSX (and am
> writing a page on that, plus make the modules available). I replaced
> my previous mod_jk with the 1.2.5 with no configuration changes
> (Apache2 + tomcat4.1). I cannot speak about tomcat 5 as I had many
> problems yesterday with it, so I reversed to the latest 4.1 instead.
>
> >Which changes has to be made in the Tomcat 5 server.xml to use the
> >new Connector-Version 1.2.5? By default, Tomcat 5 is configured for
> >JK2, or not?
> >
> [...]
>
> Giuliano
> --
> H U M P H
>   || |||
>  software
>
> Java & C++ Server/Client/Human Interface applications on MacOS - MacOS X
> http://www.humph.com/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-user-unsubscribe@(protected)
> For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-user-help@(protected)
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-user-unsubscribe@(protected)
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-user-help@(protected)