Ah im in the same boat as you. Though I can get one site working well with
mod_jk2 but multiple instances are not working unless I map all extensions
using uri in workers2.properties.

How many instances are your running? 1 or multiple? dealing with one is
very easy.

John

> Running Red Hat Fed Core 2, Apache 2.0.51, Tomcat 5.0.x.
>
> I'm trying to configure Apache and Tomcat like I have countless times
> before. The only mod_jk source or binary I can find is for Apache
> 2.0.50. If I try to use it with 2.0.51 it's a no-go.
>
> Since the documentation on mod_jk2 is horrendous, and I've NEVER been
> able to properly get it to work, I really would like to continue with
> mod_jk without re-installing Apache 2.0.50.
>
> More disturbingly, I saw this archive email:
>
> > >Should we see the works on mod_proxy and ajp support in the upcoming
> 2.0.51 ?
> >
> > No, not in 2.0.51 (and to your following question of 2.0.x later
> > releases, also likely no.)
> http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@(protected)
>
> So, is mod_jk not being supported with a 2.0.51 version?
>
> Does anyone have a better option for me? Can anyone show me the Holy
> Grail of mod_jk2 properties file documentation?
>
> Any other options?
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-user-unsubscribe@(protected)
> For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-user-help@(protected)
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-user-unsubscribe@(protected)
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-user-help@(protected)