I think Tim has a point here: It seems like the J2EE-Patterns have pretty
much saturated by now and therefore the discussions here have significantly
cooled. The hot topics have moved down into specific frameworks (like jsf or
the endless list of IoC-containers, the whole lightweight movement..) - I
personally don't think that this is bad: By definition, there should be a
limited number of patterns and most of these patterns have now been around
for quite a while and it's quite ok, that there a pretty well understood and
there are not so many things left to discuss.
Cheers
Stf
PS: The other, a little less positive interpretation stems from the
lightweight-movement. Underlying all these IoC-Framenworks like Spring or
Pico is the assumption, that there are some seriously flawed concepts inside
j2ee (e.g. EntityBeans) that make the developers life harder as it could be.
By eliminating some of these concepts, there disappears the need for many
j2ee-patterns (e.g. DTO). Of course there appear new patterns - but
obviously these patterns are now discussed somewhere else.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: An interest list for Sun Java Center J2EE Pattern
> Catalog [mailto:J2EEPATTERNS-INTEREST@(protected)
> Of Ben Hill
> Sent: Freitag, 7. Januar 2005 11:18
> To: J2EEPATTERNS-INTEREST@(protected)
> Subject: Re: Why is there no discussion of J2EE Patterns?
>
> You are able to start discussions yourself without relying on others.
>
> I'm CCing you this mail as you will be unsubscribed by now.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim Lucas [mailto:t.lucas@(protected)]
> Sent: 07 January 2005 08:05
> To: J2EEPATTERNS-INTEREST@(protected)
> Subject: Why is there no discussion of J2EE Patterns?
>
>
> I've been subscribed to this list for a few weeks now and
> have only seen a
> single thread even mildly related to J2EE Patterns (the
> static method in DAOs
> thread).
>
> Just thought I'd send this note of observation before unsubscribing.
>
> - tim
>
> ====================================================================
> Companion Site: http://www.corej2eepatterns.com
> J2EE BluePrints: http://java.sun.com/blueprints/corej2eepatterns
> List Archive:
> http://archives.java.sun.com/archives/j2eepatterns-interest.html
> Unsubscribing: email "signoff J2EEPATTERNS-INTEREST" to
> listserv@(protected)
>
>
> ********************************************************************
>
> This email may contain information which is privileged or
> confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this
> email, please notify the sender immediately and delete it
> without reading, copying, storing, forwarding or disclosing
> its contents to any other person
> Thank you
>
> Check us out at http://www.bt.com/consulting
>
> ********************************************************************
>
> ====================================================================
> Companion Site: http://www.corej2eepatterns.com
> J2EE BluePrints: http://java.sun.com/blueprints/corej2eepatterns
> List Archive:
> http://archives.java.sun.com/archives/j2eepatterns-interest.html
> Unsubscribing: email "signoff J2EEPATTERNS-INTEREST" to
> listserv@(protected)
>
====================================================================
Companion Site: http://www.corej2eepatterns.com
J2EE BluePrints: http://java.sun.com/blueprints/corej2eepatterns
List Archive: http://archives.java.sun.com/archives/j2eepatterns-interest.html
Unsubscribing: email "signoff J2EEPATTERNS-INTEREST" to listserv@(protected)
