sockets Vs RMI 2005-06-24 - By Eric Parker
Back
We did this using JMS. Works very well. To get through proxy setups you
can either use a JMS product that tunnels over HTTP, or write another
interface over web services for use in these cases. HTH
cheers,
-ep
Kamal Kishore wrote:
> We are developing a stock exchange application with thick swing client -
> server architecture.
>
> we need to finalize the protocol between client and server (Sockets or
> RMI).
>
> Actually some of the classes have already been developed using Sockets, but
> now we are afraid of the growing complexity
> and issue of maintainability.
>
> What will be the impact on performance if we go for RMI.
>
> Is there any other approach possible.
>
> thanks in advance for your kind response
>
> cheers,
> kamal
>
>
> This e-Mail may contain proprietary and confidential information and is sent
for the intended recipient(s) only.
> If by an addressing or transmission error this mail has been misdirected to
you, you are requested to delete this mail immediately.
> You are also hereby notified that any use, any form of reproduction,
dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification,
> distribution and/or publication of this e-mail message, contents or its
attachment other than by its intended recipient/s is strictly prohibited.
>
> Visit Us at http://www.polaris.co.in
>
> ====================================================================
> Companion Site: http://www.corej2eepatterns.com
> J2EE BluePrints: http://java.sun.com/blueprints/corej2eepatterns
> List Archive: http://archives.java.sun.com/archives/j2eepatterns-interest.html
> Unsubscribing: email "signoff J2EEPATTERNS-INTEREST" to listserv@(protected)
>
>
====================================================================
Companion Site: http://www.corej2eepatterns.com
J2EE BluePrints: http://java.sun.com/blueprints/corej2eepatterns
List Archive: http://archives.java.sun.com/archives/j2eepatterns-interest.html
Unsubscribing: email "signoff J2EEPATTERNS-INTEREST" to listserv@(protected)
|
|
