Java Mailing List Archive

http://www.junlu.com/

Home » Home (12/2007) » J2EE Interest »

Re: new String

Mark Galbreath

2005-10-17

Replies:

This is not true. Since strings are immutable, a new string instances will be created no matter what method is used. The two are equivalent.

Cheers,
Mark


Frans Verhoef wrote:

>Hi,
>String s1 = "test" is definitely preferred, as the other version creates two objects containing "test". Also, when you assign many times "test" to a string object, than only one string is created in memory, while if you use new String("test"), a new string is created every single time.
>
>For example:
>
>String[] s = new String[1000000];
>for (int i=0; i<1000000; i++) s[i] ="test"; // uses hardly any memory
>
>for (int i=0; i<1000000; i++) s[i] = new String("test"); // uses lots of memory, as each time a new string is created
>
>Cheers,
>Frans
>
>On Sun, 16 Oct 2005 16:00:49 +0530, KR Kumar wrote:
>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Plz let me know which one is better in terms of performace between
>> the two of the following approaches for string initialization
>>
>> String s1 = new String(?test?)
>>
>> Or
>>
>> String s1 = ?test?
>>
>> Kumar
>> ======================================================================
>> ===== To unsubscribe, send email to listserv@(protected)
>> include in the body of the message "signoff J2EE-INTEREST". For
>> general help, send email to listserv@(protected)
>> the body of the message "help".
>>
>>
>
>===========================================================================
>To unsubscribe, send email to listserv@(protected)
>of the message "signoff J2EE-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
>listserv@(protected)".
>
>
>
>

===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to listserv@(protected)
of the message "signoff J2EE-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
listserv@(protected)".
©2008 junlu.com - Jax Systems, LLC, U.S.A.