Subject: Review 2006-03-28 - By S.Kasabov
Back
-- -- Original Message -- --
From: "S.Kasabov" <s_kasabov@(protected)>
To: <J2EE-INTEREST@(protected)>
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 3:42 PM
Subject: Re: [Application servers] Review
> Please let me note that some of the criteria mentioned are orthogonal.
>
> Spas
> -- -- Original Message -- --
> From: "Alain Nussbaumer" <java@(protected)>
> To: <J2EE-INTEREST@(protected)>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 3:03 PM
> Subject: Re: [Application servers] Review
>
>
>> Hi Rajesh,
>> Yes and no. The open source element has a weight (I don't know how heavy
>> it is
>> yet). So, if there are more advantages on other criteria of proprietary
>> J2EE
>> application servers they will have a better score in the review.
>> Thanks for your comment.
>>
>> Alain
>>
>> Quoting "Rajesh R.V." <rajeshrv@(protected)>:
>>
>>>
>>> If Open source is one of your criteria then Weblogic and Websphere you
>>> can remove from the list.
>>>
>>> RV
>>> -- --Original Message-- --
>>> From: A mailing list for Java(tm) 2 Platform, Enterprise Edition
>>> [mailto:J2EE-INTEREST@(protected)]
>>> Sent: 28 March 2006 13:15
>>> To: J2EE-INTEREST@(protected)
>>> Subject: [Application servers] Review
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>> We currently use the application server from Borland for our needs. For
>>> the following main reasons, we would like to review some other
>>> application servers:
>>>
>>> - Bad support experience.
>>> - Borland strategy unclear against their application server.
>>> - BES (Borland Enterprise Server) is not well spread.
>>>
>>> So we want to review some of the following application servers:
>>>
>>> - Jonas,
>>> - JBoss,
>>> - Websphere,
>>> - Weblogic,
>>> - Geronimo
>>> - JSAS
>>>
>>> Of course, the review must be based on objective criteria. I already
>>> thought about the following criteria:
>>>
>>> - Support
>>> - Component versions (J2EE, JMX, JDBC, ...)
>>> - Deployment procedure
>>> - Server administration
>>> - IDE integration
>>> - Server reliability
>>> - BES comparison
>>> - Current applications, that run on BES, migration
>>> - Clustering ability
>>> - Load balancing ability
>>> - License cost
>>> - Open source
>>>
>>> If you see a criteria that should be on the list, please tell me.
>>> Moreover, it would be great to put a weight on every criteria of this
>>> list.
>>> Please don't hesistate to give me some suggestions.
>>>
>>> Thanks to everyone in advance.
>>>
>>> Alain Nussbaumer
>>>
>>> ========================================================================
>>> ===
>>> To unsubscribe, send email to listserv@(protected) and include in the
>>> body of the message "signoff J2EE-INTEREST". For general help, send
>>> email to listserv@(protected) and include in the body of the message
>>> "help".
>>>
>>> ===========================================================================
>>> To unsubscribe, send email to listserv@(protected) and include in the
>>> body
>>> of the message "signoff J2EE-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
>>> listserv@(protected) and include in the body of the message "help".
>>>
>>
>> ===========================================================================
>> To unsubscribe, send email to listserv@(protected) and include in the
>> body
>> of the message "signoff J2EE-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
>> listserv@(protected) and include in the body of the message "help".
>>
>>
>
> ===========================================================================
> To unsubscribe, send email to listserv@(protected) and include in the
> body
> of the message "signoff J2EE-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
> listserv@(protected) and include in the body of the message "help".
>
>
>
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to listserv@(protected) and include in the body
of the message "signoff J2EE-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
listserv@(protected) and include in the body of the message "help".
|
|
