 | | | Multiple IPs for VirtualHost | Multiple IPs for VirtualHost 2004-02-19 - By Wil Hatfield
No I mean two completely different servers unconnected in any way. But I
used the same redundant setup on the one and it works without error while
the other errors as I stated.
....
Using a wildcard setup does that mean it would answer on all IPs and ports?
These are configurations I haven't played with in along time.
NameVirtualHost *
What would the VirtualHost directive look like again?
Wil Hatfield
> -----Original Message-----
> From: BAO RuiXian [mailto:ruixian.bao@(protected)]
> Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 2:25 PM
> To: users@(protected)
> Subject: Re: [users@(protected)] Multiple IPs for VirtualHost
>
>
>
>
> Wil Hatfield wrote:
>
> >Basically here is what I have. Funny thing is this configuration seems to
> >work fine on one machine but not on another.
> >
> >
> Don't quite understand what do you mean by the above. Do you mean that
> the one machine and another are client machines?
>
> >NameVirtualHost 216.120.76.4:80
> >NameVirtualHost 66.181.8.132:80
> >
> >
> In your case of transition from one ip to another, how about you just
> use a single NameVirtualHost directive followed by a wild card *, and
> also make corresponding changes, then you don't need to make two sets of
> same virtual hosts in the following.
>
> Best
>
> Bao
>
> ><VirtualHost 216.120.76.4:80>
> >Servername www.domainone.com
> ></VirtualHost>
> >
> ><VirtualHost 66.181.8.132:80>
> >Servername www.domainone.com
> ></VirtualHost>
> >
> ><VirtualHost 216.120.76.4:80>
> >Servername www.domaintwo.com
> ></VirtualHost>
> >
> ><VirtualHost 66.181.8.132:80>
> >Servername www.domaintwo.com
> ></VirtualHost>
> >
> >
> >Thanks again,
> >
> >Wil Hatfield
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: BAO RuiXian [mailto:ruixian.bao@(protected)]
> >>Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 1:20 PM
> >>To: users@(protected)
> >>Subject: Re: [users@(protected)] Multiple IPs for VirtualHost
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>Wil Hatfield wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>Is there an optimal way of setting up a domain at two different IP
> >>>addresses. We are switching subnets and want to have redundancy until
> >>>the ISPs around the globe flush their caches. Right now I am getting
> >>>the following errors:
> >>>
> >>>[error] VirtualHost xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:80 mixing * ports and non-* ports
> >>>with a NameVirtualHost address is not supported, proceeding with
> >>>undefined results
> >>>[warn] NameVirtualHost xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:80 has no VirtualHosts
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>I guess in your NameVirtualHost argument there is no port defined, hence
> >>comes the error "mixing * ports and non-* ports...". Please make the
> >>arguments after NameVirtualHost and VirtualHost consistent to see if the
> >>error goes away.
> >>
> >>Best
> >>
> >>Bao
> >>
> >>PS: you may don't want to send HTML format messages, which are disliked
> >>by most subscribers.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>Thanks in advance,
> >>>
> >>>Wil
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP
> Server Project.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
> See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@(protected)
> " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@(protected)
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@(protected)
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@(protected)
" from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@(protected)
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@(protected)
|
|
|
