-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Chris,

Chris Adams wrote:
> Your empirical data really isn't useful, because it's based upon an
> assumption that could very easily be false.

Good point. Still, nobody has given any source for this information, so
I'm inclined to consider it a myth for the time being.

- -chris

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFcFI59CaO5/Lv0PARAnv2AKCbGFFBFjP9+SO6t8PYeekKDNetuQCdGSMs
a7vrxbsJKmssB8HX7aA1ndA=
=oFZc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@(protected)
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@(protected)
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@(protected)