>
>
>Frack, after all Chuck started it. Get a life, and let these two little
>kiddies get on with their mud fight.
>
>

Who started what is debatable but there's no need to continue it -- or
invite it as is the case here.

--David


Bill Barker wrote:

>"Mark Thomas" <markt@(protected)
>news:4596E06A.5080808@(protected)...
>
>
>>Martin Gainty wrote:
>>  
>>
>>>Im still waiting for the usual insults from chuck..then again maybe he
>>>took the day off..
>>>    
>>>
>>Martin,
>>
>>This sort of comment is completely out of line. There is no
>>justification whatsoever for your behaviour on this thread.
>>
>>I expect to see a public apology on this thread from you to Chuck
>>forthwith.
>>
>>  
>>
>
>Frack, after all Chuck started it. Get a life, and let these two little
>kiddies get on with their mud fight. Just do what I do and block both of
>them :).
>
>
>
>>This is the second time I have had to ask you to apologise to Chuck.
>>You ignored my request the last time, I do not expect to be ignored a
>>second time.
>>
>>Mark
>>users-owner@(protected)
>>
>>  
>>
>
>This sort of gross over-reaction is a sure sign that you should pass this
>title on to someone else. Remember that this isn't a cathedral, it's a
>bazaar.
>
>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>To start a new topic, e-mail: users@(protected)
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@(protected)
>>For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@(protected)
>>
>>
>>  
>>
>
>
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To start a new topic, e-mail: users@(protected)
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@(protected)
>For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@(protected)
>
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@(protected)
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@(protected)
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@(protected)