Paulo Soares wrote:
> This looks like nit-picking but I'll let Bruno answer this one.
>
> Paulo


I presume the "non-nuclear" restriction was a copy of the original Sun
licensing which has the non-nuclear facility caveat ? What was the
intended purpose at Sun of this ? What was the intended purpose by
iText authors by mimicking this ?

* Just a user beware the software should not be used in any real-time
life threatening computerized system (due to the garbage collection
effect with non-linear processing time) ?

* Because the authors have a specific issue with the software being used
within the atomic nuclear industry, if so was this to cover power
stations ? material processing? weapons ? or some form of
anti-nuclear protest ?


If the original conception of the thought that is embodied by the
wording can be understand then the intent of the statement can be fully
understood and a course of action be taken.

Darryl


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
iText-questions mailing list
iText-questions@(protected)
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/itext-questions
Buy the iText book: http://itext.ugent.be/itext-in-action/