Jochen Schmitt wrote:
> If you wrote 'This software is not designed for using for ...'
> this may be ok. But if you wrote 'Thsi software is not licensed
> for use ...' that is a usage restriction which we can't accept.
>
> I agree with you, that an open source author may not take the
> warrenty for using the software in a special situation, but if
> you wrote 'is not licensed for' that sound like to prohibit the
> usage of the software for a special case.

The conversation was interesting, but now I'm confused:
is there any further action required by us?
I mean: the sun.txt has been removed from SVN.
It's no longer in iText 1.5.3. I see it's still in
iText 2.0.4, but it won't be in iText 2.0.5 (the
next release is scheduled for September).
br,
Bruno

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
iText-questions mailing list
iText-questions@(protected)
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/itext-questions
Buy the iText book: http://itext.ugent.be/itext-in-action/