Confusing - Compression 5.0.16 - Filter or connector??? 2003-12-09 - By Ron Andersen
Back
I am only using one platform and I need the best performance, since I will be
compressing images. Therefore, if I use the connector compression, shall I turn
the filter compression off(in web.xml). Also, does the connector(in server.xml)
support the following attributes??
compression="on"
compressionMinSize="2048"
noCompressionUserAgents="gozilla, traviata"
compressableMimeType="text/html,text/xml"
Remy Maucherat <remm@(protected)> wrote:
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
> Howdy,
> Yup, it would be attempted twice (if the request matches both the filter
> and the connector, which is the default setup). Personally I prefer the
> filter, as it's more portable and not tomcat-specific.
I prefer the connector, since it's faster and more powerful (you get the
regexp based exception list Henri added, etc) :)
If we (ever) get a gz impl that isn't an output stream and could work on
"straight" byte arrays, we'd also be able to do the compression without
facade objects at all, which would have the best performance.
--
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
R�my Maucherat
Senior Developer & Consultant
JBoss Group (Europe) S�RL
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-user-unsubscribe@(protected)
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-user-help@(protected)
-- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- -----
Do you Yahoo!?
Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard
|
|
