At 3:32 PM -0800 1/19/04, Dennis Sosnoski wrote:

>[Definition: Conforming documents and XML processors are required to
>behave as described; otherwise they are in error. ]"
>
>As it stands now JDOM violates the XML recommendation. I think
>that's fine, but JDOM should say that it supports XML+Namespaces
>rather than plain XML - which it demonstrably does not.

As long as we're playing language lawyer, JDOM is not in violation.
It is neither an XML processor nor an XML document. Hence the
passages you cite do not apply to it.

--

 Elliotte Rusty Harold
 elharo@(protected)
 Effective XML (Addison-Wesley, 2003)
 http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/effectivexml
 http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0321150406/ref%3Dnosim/cafeaulaitA
_______________________________________________
To control your jdom-interest membership:
http://lists.denveronline.net/mailman/options/jdom-interest/youraddr@(protected)