Moderate this list? 2004-03-10 - By Charles Bradley
Back
Aaron,
1. I'm having trouble understanding how a Java-C++ communication transport
layer has anything to do with J2EE patterns. Perhaps you should have asked,
"Is there a pattern for ..." We could have all said "No", and most likely some
people would suggest patterns, as well as suggesting technological idioms
(which they very nicely did -- though they probably should have done it
off-list).
2. When Mark made a legitamate complaint that you were off topic, you
responded in what *some* might consider a whiney response, instead of
respecting the list by apologizing or explaining how you thought your question
was relevant to the list.
3. I personally gave you a list of other email lists on which you might try
your post. For instance, 3 lists that were better suited to your query are:
CONNECTOR-INTEREST
http://archives.java.sun.com/archives/connector-interest.html
J2EE-INTEREST
http://archives.java.sun.com/archives/j2ee-interest.html
JMS-INTEREST
http://archives.java.sun.com/archives/jms-interest.html
4. All I'm trying to say is this: Respect the list, and the time of users on
the list. If you're going to post, you should make a reasonable effort to make
it "on topic". I don't like the "whining" comment either, but don't let that
distract you from the more professional aspects of your query.
5. I'm curious... In your original email, you state:
> ...We have checked two approaches:
> 1. JMS - no C++ support...
How did you come to be able to use JMS to solve your problem if there is no C++
support? (Feel free to respond offline to this one)
Good luck. You've got a challenge ahead of you.
cb
>
> Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 09:52:49 +0200
> From: Aaron Tubman <aharon@(protected)>
> Subject: Re: Moderate this list?
>
> Thanks James,
>
> You are right that my question was not formulated correctly because, may
> be, I tried to short the way. The real problem is finding pattern that
> allows an obvious, cross-platform solution to synchronous and
> asynchronous message passing.=20
>
> We already have the solution, which is a conjunction of JMS, JMS
> Response strategy, Transfer Object, Transfer Object Assembler, and Web
> Service Broker Pattern.
>
> As to particular technology, we have a lot of knowledge inside of the
> firm. Anyway, your answer confirms our approach.=20
> One more question. Can you suggest other sources (book, i-net) dealing
> with this issue, especialy with Web Service Broker pattern and its
> strategies.
>
> As to You Mark,
> When discuss some issue I expect to concern replay rather than the
> uncouth from 'intelligent' persons. Also I think that the word 'whining'
> does not an intelligent one. Any way, if you have some problem with me
> personaly you can e-mail me directly aharon@(protected)=20
>
>
>
> Aaron Tubman
>
====================================================================
Companion Site: http://www.corej2eepatterns.com
J2EE BluePrints: http://java.sun.com/blueprints/corej2eepatterns
List Archive: http://archives.java.sun.com/archives/j2eepatterns-interest.html
Unsubscribing: email "signoff J2EEPATTERNS-INTEREST" to listserv@(protected)
|
|
